











Françai |
Democracy Watch's
Definition of a Democratic Society
Democracy Watch's mandate, 20
Steps
towards a Modern, Working Democracy, and its position that the System is the Scandal, are
based upon the following
definition of a democratic society (Click here
to see other organizations' definitions of the key elements needed for
a democratic society):
A DEMOCRACY IS a society in
which all adults
have easily accessible, meaningful, and effective ways:
- to participate in the decision-making processes of every
organization
that
makes decisions or takes actions that affect them, and;
- to hold other individuals, and those in these organizations
who are
responsible
for making decisions and taking actions, fully accountable if their
decisions
or actions violate fundamental human rights, or are dishonest,
unethical,
unfair, secretive, inefficient, unrepresentative, unresponsive or
irresponsible;
so that all organizations in the society are citizen-owned,
citizen-controlled,
and citizen-driven, and all individuals and organizations are held
accountable
for wrongdoing.
All children should also have easily accessible, meaningful,
and effective
ways to hold organizations accountable as set out in #2 above, but it
is
acceptable in a democracy to limit children's participation rights
until
they reach adulthood, mainly because psychological research has shown
clearly
that almost all children below a certain age do not have fully formed
brains,
and are not usually as capable of reasonable deliberation and
discussion as adults.
The following participation and accountability measures need
to be in
place in every organization (both government and corporate, public and
private) in any society to fulfill the definition set out above (and
Democracy
Watch's campaigns push governments
and
corporations to implement these measures):
- a constitution that sets out the essential operating rules
for the
organization
(or the country, province/state, and municipalities), including strong
protection of fundamental human rights;
- an election system for choosing representatives that is
fair and
results
in a governing body that represents citizen votes accurately;
- a direct decision-making process (initiative and
referendum, for
example)
that allows citizens to initiate decisions and actions on issues that
their
representatives refuse to address;
- strong requirements with no loopholes that apply to every
organization
(especially every government or government-funded institution, but also
every corporate organization (especially large corporations -- for
details,
go to the Bank Accountability Campaign
and the Corporate Responsibility
Campaign), media,
non-profit citizen group, and charitable social service agency) in the
areas of:
- representativeness (elections, public consultation and
direct
decision-making
processes -- for details, go to the Voter
Rights Campaign);
- openness (disclosure requirements and
access-to-information laws -- for
details, go to the Open Government
Campaign);
- honesty (including an honesty-in-politics law with an
easily accessible
complaint filing process -- for details, go to the Honesty
in Politics Campaign);
- ethics (including limits on donations, gifts and other
money-related
ways
of influencing decision-makers, and strict regulations on lobbyists --
for details, go to the Government
Ethics
Campaign and the Money in Politics
Campaign), and;
- spending (strict waste-prevention measures),
responsiveness and
responsibility
in general operations (including publicly disclosed performance
standards
and performance reports -- for details, go to the Voter
Rights Campaign) -- AND these requirements must also apply to every
individual in the areas of
relationships with other individuals and individual responsibility;
- to emphasize, the requirements must be strong enough and
comprehensive
enough to ensure that citizens not only own governments (as voters and
taxpayers), corporations (as shareholders), unions and citizen groups
(as
members), and public resources (land, water, air, TV/radio airwaves,
publicly
generated research and infrastructure), but also that citizens
effectively
control governments, corporations, unions and other citizen groups, and
public resources;
- watchdog agencies (including police) that are fully
independent (from
political
or other biased influence), fully empowered (to investigate and
penalize),
and fully resourced (to ensure a high chance that violators will be
caught)
that strictly enforce the strong requirements in the areas of
elections,
public consultation and direct decision-making processes,
access-to-information,
honesty, ethics, spending, and general operations, and the strong
requirements
for individuals concerning relationships with other individuals and
individual
responsibility;
- courts/tribunals that are fully independent (from political
or other
biased
influence), fully empowered (to investigate and penalize), fully
resourced
(to ensure justice is not unreasonable delayed) to handle disputes
about
rights and responsibilities in every other area of society (including
protection
of fundamental human rights);
- a clear right for anyone to "blow the whistle" on any
violation of any
requirement, and to be protected from retaliation and rewarded if the
requirement
violation is proven true;
- a clear right for citizens to complain to the watchdog
agencies, and to
the courts/tribunals, if any requirement is violated, including the
right
to sue as a group (known as "class actions");
- penalties for the violation of requirements that are high
enough to
actually
and effectively discourage violations of the requirements;
- every large organization (especially government and large
corporations)
required to assist the citizens affected by it to organize into, and
sustain,
a citizen group that will advocate for the interests of the citizens
and
help them hold the organization accountable (For details, go to Citizen
Association Campaign);
- an easily accessible means (TV, radio, print publications,
Internet
sites)
for citizens to share key, accurate information with each other about
every
organizations' record in complying with the strong requirements set out
above;
- an economy large enough to finance the operation of all of
the above
organizations/investigative
agencies/courts/citizen groups, and equitable enough so that every
citizen
(adults and children) has easy access to the above participation and
accountability
rights, and;
- enough people with the needed skills, knowledge and
integrity to ensure
that the operation of the above organizations and agencies, and
participation
and accountability rights, actually functions.
However, it is important to note that even if all 14 measures set out
above are in place and functioning effectively, it is still essentially
impossible to stop three key undemocratic activities, and as a result
these three activities (even if they don't occur very often) will
always remain a threat to all societies aspiring to be democracies, as
follows:
- it is essentially impossible to stop secret gifts of money
and favour-trading corrupting politicians and government officials;
- it is essentially impossible to stop secret lobbying of
politicians and government officials and government secrecy overall,
and;
- it is essentially impossible to stop police, security and
armed forces from abusing their secret investigation powers by invading
people's privacy and rights.
Copyright Democracy Watch 2004
International
Definitions of Key Elements of a Democratic Society
- Global
Integrity
(non-governmental organization that, through an international research
effort involving local organizations, individuals and journalists,
rates
countries good governance and anti-corruption systems and democratic
processes)
- June
2000
Warsaw Declaration of the Community of Democracies (PDF format, to
see the Declaration in HTML format, click
here) -- the Community of Democracies is a coalition of more than
100
countries initiated in 1999 with the common goal of strengthening
democratic
institutions and values at the national, regional, and global levels --
the Warsaw declaration resulted from the first meeting of the
countries'
governmental representatives in Warsaw Poland in June 2000, a plan of
action
was developed and endorsed by 95 countries at the 2nd meeting of the
governments
in Seoul, South Korea in November 2002, and the 4th
meeting of governments was held in Bamako, Mali in November 2007)
- Founding
Statement
of the World Movement for Democracy (the World
Movement for Democracy is a network of non-governmental
organizations,
politicians, academics and others supporting the development of
democracy
world-wide)
- The International Endowment
for Democracy
is a networking organization formed in spring 2006 in the U.S. to push
for democratic reforms in the U.S.
Please become a Supporter of
democratic
reform, government accountability and corporate responsibility in Canada
|